Re: Overhauling our interrupt handling
От | Kyotaro HORIGUCHI |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Overhauling our interrupt handling |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 20150116.104102.131609138.horiguchi.kyotaro@lab.ntt.co.jp обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Overhauling our interrupt handling (Andres Freund <andres@2ndquadrant.com>) |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Hello, > > I think I should finilize my commitfest item for this issue, with > > .. "Rejected"? > > Fine with me. done. > > > 0001: Replace walsender's latch with the general shared latch. > > > > > > New patch that removes ImmediateInteruptOK behaviour from walsender. I > > > think that's a rather good idea, because walsender currently seems to > > > assume WaitLatchOrSocket is reentrant - which I don't think is really > > > guaranteed. > > > Hasn't been reviewed yet, but I think it's not far from being > > > committable. > > > > Deesn't this patchset containing per-socket basis non-blocking > > control for win32? It should make the code (above the win32 > > socket layer itself) more simpler. > > I don't think so - we still rely on it unfortunately. Does "it" mean win32_noblock? Or the nonblocking bare win32 socket? The win32-per-sock-blkng-cntl patch in the below message should cover both of them. http://www.postgresql.org/message-id/54060AE5.5020502@vmware.com If you are saying it should be a patch separate from this, I'll do so. regareds, -- Kyotaro Horiguchi NTT Open Source Software Center
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: