Re: Fixing memory leak in pg_upgrade
От | Bruce Momjian |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Fixing memory leak in pg_upgrade |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 20150109172759.GB26812@momjian.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Fixing memory leak in pg_upgrade (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
Ответы |
Re: Fixing memory leak in pg_upgrade
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Fri, Jan 9, 2015 at 11:34:24AM -0500, Tom Lane wrote: > Tatsuo Ishii <ishii@postgresql.org> writes: > > According to Coverity, there's a memory leak bug in transfer_all_new_dbs(). > > It's pretty difficult to get excited about that; how many table-free > databases is pg_upgrade likely to see in one run? But surely we could > just move the pg_free call to after the if-block. I have fixed this with the attached, applied patch. I thought malloc(0) would return null, but our src/common pg_malloc() has: /* Avoid unportable behavior of malloc(0) */ if (size == 0) size = 1; so some memory is allocated, and has to be freed. I looked at avoiding the call to gen_db_file_maps() for old_db->rel_arr.nrels == 0, but there are checks in there comparing the old/new relation counts, so it can't be skipped. I also removed the unnecessary memory initialization. -- Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> http://momjian.us EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com + Everyone has their own god. +
Вложения
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: