Re: Updating copyright notices to 2015 for PGDG
От | Bruce Momjian |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Updating copyright notices to 2015 for PGDG |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 20150106211656.GC17824@momjian.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Updating copyright notices to 2015 for PGDG (Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@2ndquadrant.com>) |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Tue, Jan 6, 2015 at 06:12:30PM -0300, Alvaro Herrera wrote: > Bruce Momjian wrote: > > On Tue, Jan 6, 2015 at 08:46:19PM +0100, Stefan Kaltenbrunner wrote: > > > > I will run the script today. I didn't do it earlier because I want to > > > > be current on reading community email before doing it. > > > > > > hmm is it intentional that the commit also changed other files? > > > > > > looks like the commited patch added newlines to various files that had > > > none before for example: > > > > Specifically, these files had no newline after the last line in the > > file. > > I don't think we have any files that require not to have a trailing > newline. Do we need an explicit check against it? Seems doubtful, but > then if the need arises, we will break it each year and who knows if > anybody will be vigilant enough to notice. Stefan caught it this time, > but who would normally skim 18000 lines of supposedly mechanical diff > looking for issues? (How did you catch this in the first place?) I am guessing pgindent would also add a newline, but since the spec files aren't C files, pgindent doesn't tough them. > This makes me wonder however how wise it is to update the copyright > notices in every single file in the repo. Why do we need this? Why not > abolish the practice and live forever with most files having copyright > 2015? (Only new files would have newer years in their copyright > notices, I guess.) Does this provide us with any kind of protection, > and if so against what, and how does it protect us? Since we have a > very clean git history which shows us the exact provenance of every > single line of source code, and we have excellent mail archives that > show where each line came from for all development in the last decade, > this single line of (C) boilerplate in each file seems completely > pointless. I think the copyright update is more of a consistency thing, rather than something that has a legal requirement. It is hard to see why we would stop doing it just to preserve missing trailing newlines we don't even know we need. -- Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> http://momjian.us EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com + Everyone has their own god. +
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: