Re: Proposal "VACUUM SCHEMA"
От | Alvaro Herrera |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Proposal "VACUUM SCHEMA" |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 20141222171107.GE1768@alvh.no-ip.org обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Proposal "VACUUM SCHEMA" (Stephen Frost <sfrost@snowman.net>) |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Stephen Frost wrote: > * Alvaro Herrera (alvherre@2ndquadrant.com) wrote: > > Overall, this whole line of development seems like bloating the parse > > tables for little gain. > > Still, I see this point also. I do think it'd be really great if we > could figure out a way to segregate these kinds of DDL / maintenance > commands from the normal select/insert/update/delete SQL parsing, such > that we could add more options, etc, to those longer running and less > frequent commands without impacting parse time for the high-volume > commands. We do have a parenthesized options clause in VACUUM. I think adding this as a clause there would be pretty much free. -- Álvaro Herrera http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/ PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: