Re: wal-e package
От | Christoph Berg |
---|---|
Тема | Re: wal-e package |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 20141215105357.GA6506@msg.df7cb.de обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: wal-e package (Christoph Berg <cb@df7cb.de>) |
Ответы |
Re: wal-e package
Re: wal-e package |
Список | pgsql-pkg-debian |
Re: To Stuart Bishop 2014-08-28 <20140828102741.GD8293@msg.df7cb.de> > Re: Stuart Bishop 2014-08-28 <CADmi=6Neo=nbkgmpdiK==-W+C081eUzZVDXJ0SxwTOQ6JVs-mA@mail.gmail.com> > > Its in bzr on Launchpad, lp:~stub/ubuntu/trusty/wal-e/trunk or > > http://bazaar.launchpad.net/~stub/ubuntu/trusty/wal-e/trunk/files > > > > # bzr-builder format 0.3 deb-version {debupstream}-0~{revno}~daily > > lp:~stub/ubuntu/trusty/wal-e/trunk > > > > The azure dependency is also in bzr at > > lp:~stub/ubuntu/trusty/python-azure/trunk, recipe at > > https://code.launchpad.net/~stub/+recipe/python-azure-daily > > Ok, I'll have a look it. Hi, sorry for the late follow-up. I actually looked at the packages a while ago and even added them to apt.postgresql.org. I just didn't get around to reply here. IIRC basically everything was fine, just a few minor things which I already forgot again :-/ Looking again now... wal-e: debian/changelog would of course need "unstable" as dist debian/control: * the short Description shouldn't end in '.' * Standards-Version is 3.9.6 now There's a new upstream version available python-azure: The Description needs more text to explain what the package actually does, including what Azure really is. Also, the long Description should (mostly) be self-contained, i.e. not be a continuation of the short Description. debian/docs is empty, remove it debian/compat is 9, but Build-Depends: debhelper is only >= 8 debian/copyright: "License: Apache License" should only be "License: Apache" (or else Lintian complains) There's also a new upstream version available I'll upload to Debian once these are fixed, thanks for the packages! > > > Would you be interested to maintain the package in Debian? I can > > > sponsor uploads. > > > > I am interested. However, I don't have any Debian systems to test > > with, so I don't know if it is practical or not. My main concern is > > the dependencies. > > Ideally the package would have testsuite in autopkgtest format. No > idea if it's testable without real S3 access or the like, but a basic > smoke test should be sufficient. (There is a "tests" directory in wal-e, but "python runtests.py" says something about 0 items, and "make test" fails with some horrible mess with $PATH and env.) Christoph -- cb@df7cb.de | http://www.df7cb.de/
В списке pgsql-pkg-debian по дате отправления: