Re: Testing DDL deparsing support
От | Bruce Momjian |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Testing DDL deparsing support |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 20141209200413.GB24487@momjian.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Testing DDL deparsing support (Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>) |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Mon, Dec 8, 2014 at 12:43:36PM -0500, Robert Haas wrote: > On Sat, Dec 6, 2014 at 10:43 PM, Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> wrote: > > This causes creation DDL is checked if it is used in the regression > > database, but what about ALTER and DROP? pg_dump doesn't issue those, > > except in special cases like inheritance. > > The proposed testing mechanism should cover any ALTER commands that > are in the regression tests provided that those objects are not > subsequently dropped -- because if the ALTER commands aren't replayed > properly, then the later pg_dump won't produce the same output. > > There probably are some gaps in our current regression tests in this > area, but that's probably a good thing to fix regardless of this. OK, I understand now that the ALTERs are being passed to the slave and we then can test that against pg_dump --- sounds good. -- Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> http://momjian.us EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com + Everyone has their own god. +
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: