Re: Review of GetUserId() Usage
От | Stephen Frost |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Review of GetUserId() Usage |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 20141202202315.GW3342@tamriel.snowman.net обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Review of GetUserId() Usage (Stephen Frost <sfrost@snowman.net>) |
Ответы |
Re: Review of GetUserId() Usage
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
* Stephen Frost (sfrost@snowman.net) wrote: > > 3. It messes around with pg_signal_backend(). There are currently no > > cases in which pg_signal_backend() throws an error, which is good, > > because it lets you write queries against pg_stat_activity() that > > don't fail halfway through, even if you are missing permissions on > > some things. This patch introduces such a case, which is bad. > > Good point, I'll move that check up into the other functions, which will > allow for a more descriptive error as well. Err, I'm missing something here, as pg_signal_backend() is a misc.c static internal function? How would you be calling it from a query against pg_stat_activity()? I'm fine making the change anyway, just curious.. Thanks, Stephen
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: