Re: BRIN indexes - TRAP: BadArgument
От | Alvaro Herrera |
---|---|
Тема | Re: BRIN indexes - TRAP: BadArgument |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 20141111130403.GP1791@alvin.alvh.no-ip.org обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: BRIN indexes - TRAP: BadArgument (Greg Stark <stark@mit.edu>) |
Ответы |
Re: BRIN indexes - TRAP: BadArgument
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Greg Stark wrote: > It might be clearer to have an opclassinfo and a scaninfo which can > store information in separate opc_opaque and scan_opaque fields with > distinct liftetimes. > > In the bloom filter case the longlived info is the (initial?) size of > the bloom filter and the number of hash functions. But I still haven't > determined how much it will cost to recalculate them. Right now > they're just hard coded so it doesn't hurt to do it on every rescan > but if it involves peeking at the index reloptions or stats that might > be impractical. Patches welcome :-) -- Álvaro Herrera http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/ PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: