Re: Vitesse DB call for testing
От | Andres Freund |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Vitesse DB call for testing |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 20141017182500.GF2075@alap3.anarazel.de обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Vitesse DB call for testing (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
Ответы |
Re: Vitesse DB call for testing
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On 2014-10-17 13:12:27 -0400, Tom Lane wrote: > Well, that's pretty much cheating: it's too hard to disentangle what's > coming from JIT vs what's coming from using a different accumulator > datatype. If we wanted to depend on having int128 available we could > get that speedup with a couple hours' work. I think doing that when configure detects int128 would make a great deal of sense. It's not like we'd save a great deal of complicated code by removing the existing accumulator... We'd still have to return a numeric, but that's likely lost in the noise cost wise. Greetings, Andres Freund -- Andres Freund http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: