Re: Review of GetUserId() Usage
От | Stephen Frost |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Review of GetUserId() Usage |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 20141016190359.GH28859@tamriel.snowman.net обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Review of GetUserId() Usage (Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: Review of GetUserId() Usage
Re: Review of GetUserId() Usage |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
* Robert Haas (robertmhaas@gmail.com) wrote: > I'm not sure what your point is. Whether keeping changes separate is > easy or hard, and whether things overlap with multiple other things or > just one, we need to make the effort to do it. What I was getting at is that the role attributes patch would need to depend on these changes.. If the two are completely independent then one would fail to apply cleanly when/if the other is committed, that's all. I'll break them into three pieces- superuser() cleanup, GetUserId() -> has_privs_of_role(), and the additional-role-attributes patch will just depend on the others. Thanks, Stephen
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: