Re: split builtins.h to quote.h
От | Stephen Frost |
---|---|
Тема | Re: split builtins.h to quote.h |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 20141013132413.GI28859@tamriel.snowman.net обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: split builtins.h to quote.h (Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>) |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
* Robert Haas (robertmhaas@gmail.com) wrote: > On Sat, Oct 11, 2014 at 6:09 PM, Stephen Frost <sfrost@snowman.net> wrote: > > * Noah Misch (noah@leadboat.com) wrote: > >> On Sat, Oct 11, 2014 at 11:43:46PM +0200, Andres Freund wrote: > >> > I personally wouldn't object plaing a #include for the splitof file into > >> > builtin.h to address backward compat concerns. Would imo still be an > >> > improvement. > >> > >> Agreed. If the patch preserved compatibility by having builtins.h include > >> quote.h, I would not object. > > > > That seems reasonable to me also- though I'd caveat it as "for now" and > > make sure to make a note of the reason it's included in the comments... > > Yuck. I think if we're going to break it, we should just break it. I'm fine with that, for my part- was simply looking for a compromise, and having a "deprecated" period of time seemed reasonable. > No significant advantage will be gained by splitting it out and then > #including it; nobody's really going to fix their module builds until > they actually break. Well, hopefully folks on -hackers would, though I agree that others aren't likely to. > What I find strange about the actual patch is that it moves some but > not all of the prototypes for the stuff that ends up in quote.c into > quote.h. That doesn't seem right. Agreed. Thanks, Stephen
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: