Re: split builtins.h to quote.h
От | Andres Freund |
---|---|
Тема | Re: split builtins.h to quote.h |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 20141011214346.GG18020@awork2.anarazel.de обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: split builtins.h to quote.h (Noah Misch <noah@leadboat.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: split builtins.h to quote.h
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On 2014-10-11 17:19:27 -0400, Noah Misch wrote: > On Sat, Oct 11, 2014 at 10:44:39AM -0300, Alvaro Herrera wrote: > > Started a new thread to raise awareness. > > > Ref: this comes from > > http://www.postgresql.org/message-id/CAB7nPqR1iVd5r_QN_ngmkBOLQmAGBOsJ4WNPo8eybNn6WE_Kdw@mail.gmail.com > > Thanks. You can assume I'm -1 on every header split proposal not driving a > substantial compile duration improvement: I don't know. Isn't it, from a aesthetic POV, wrong to have all that stuff in builtins.h? The stuff split of really doesn't seem to belong there? I personally wouldn't object plaing a #include for the splitof file into builtin.h to address backward compat concerns. Would imo still be an improvement. Greetings, Andres Freund -- Andres Freund http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: