Re: Wait free LW_SHARED acquisition - v0.9
От | Andres Freund |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Wait free LW_SHARED acquisition - v0.9 |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 20141011131045.GC18020@awork2.anarazel.de обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Wait free LW_SHARED acquisition - v0.9 (Amit Kapila <amit.kapila16@gmail.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: Wait free LW_SHARED acquisition - v0.9
Re: Wait free LW_SHARED acquisition - v0.9 |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Hi, On 2014-10-11 07:26:57 +0530, Amit Kapila wrote: > On Sat, Oct 11, 2014 at 7:00 AM, Andres Freund <andres@2ndquadrant.com> > > And since > > your general performance numbers are a fair bit lower than what I see > > with, hopefully, the same code on the same machine... > > You have reported numbers at 1000 scale factor and mine were > at 3000 scale factor, so I think the difference is expected. The numbers for 3000 show pretty much the same: SCALE 128 160 175 HEAD 352113 339005 336491 LW_SHARED 365874 347931 342528 Hm. I wonder if you're using pgbench without -M prepared? That'd about explain the difference. Greetings, Andres Freund -- Andres Freund http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: