Re: Feature request: smarter use of conditional indexes
От | Tom Lane |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Feature request: smarter use of conditional indexes |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 20141.1078631217@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Feature request: smarter use of conditional indexes (Larry Rosenman <ler@lerctr.org>) |
Ответы |
Re: Feature request: smarter use of conditional indexes
|
Список | pgsql-performance |
Larry Rosenman <ler@lerctr.org> writes: > Just a suggestion, please use diff -c format, as it makes it easier for > the folks who apply the patches to do so. That's not just a suggestion ... patches that aren't in diff -c (or at least diff -u) format will be rejected out of hand. Without the context lines provided by these formats, applying a patch is an exercise in risk-taking, because you can't be certain that you are applying the same patch the submitter intended. Personally I consider -c format the only one of the three that is readable for reviewing purposes, so even if I weren't intending immediate application, I'd ask for -c before looking at the patch. There are some folks who consider -u format readable, but I'm not one of them ... BTW, patches really ought to go to pgsql-patches ... they're a bit off-topic here. regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-performance по дате отправления: