Re: proposal: rounding up time value less than its unit.
От | Stephen Frost |
---|---|
Тема | Re: proposal: rounding up time value less than its unit. |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 20140926192934.GB16422@tamriel.snowman.net обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: proposal: rounding up time value less than its unit. (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
* Tom Lane (tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us) wrote: > > There are others where min_val is -1 for the same reason, where > > functionally the minimum is really 0. Some of us would like to see > > min_val reflect the useful minimum, period, and move all these special > > case ones out of there. That is a multi-year battle to engage in > > though, and there's little real value to the user community coming out > > of it relative to that work scope. > > The impression I had was that Stephen was thinking of actually setting > min_val to 1 (or whatever) and handling zero or -1 in some out-of-band > fashion, perhaps by adding GUC flag bits showing those as allowable > special cases. I'm not sure how we would display such a state of affairs > in pg_settings, but other than that it doesn't sound implausible. Yes. I'm not 100% sure about how to deal with it in pg_settings, but that is the general idea. > We could alternatively try to split up these cases into multiple GUCs, > which I guess is what you're imagining as a "multi-year battle". But > personally I think any such proposal will fail on the grounds that > it's too much compatibility loss for the value gained. Agreed. Thanks, Stephen
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: