Re: WITH CHECK and Column-Level Privileges
От | Stephen Frost |
---|---|
Тема | Re: WITH CHECK and Column-Level Privileges |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 20140926153509.GO16422@tamriel.snowman.net обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: WITH CHECK and Column-Level Privileges (Stephen Frost <sfrost@snowman.net>) |
Ответы |
Re: WITH CHECK and Column-Level Privileges
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
* Stephen Frost (sfrost@snowman.net) wrote: > * Stephen Frost (sfrost@snowman.net) wrote: > > > Is there similar problems with unique or exclusion constraints? > > > > That's certainly an excellent question.. I'll have to go look. > > Looks like there is an issue here with CHECK constraints and NOT NULL > constraints, yes. The uniqueness check complains about the key already > existing and returns the key, but I don't think that's actually a > problem- to get that to happen you have to specify the new key and > that's what is returned. Yeah, I take that back. If there is a composite key involved then you can run into the same issue- you update one of the columns to a conflicting value and get back the entire key, including columns you shouldn't be allowed to see. Ugh. Thanks, Stephen
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: