Re: Review of GetUserId() Usage
От | Stephen Frost |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Review of GetUserId() Usage |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 20140924205824.GU16422@tamriel.snowman.net обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Review of GetUserId() Usage (Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@2ndquadrant.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: Review of GetUserId() Usage
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Alvaro, * Alvaro Herrera (alvherre@2ndquadrant.com) wrote: > I think the case for pgstat_get_backend_current_activity() and > pg_stat_get_activity and the other pgstatfuncs.c callers is easy to make > and seems acceptable to me; but I would leave pg_signal_backend out of > that discussion, because it has a potentially harmful side effect. By > requiring SET ROLE you add an extra layer of protection against > mistakes. (Hopefully, pg_signal_backend() is not a routine thing for > well-run systems, which means human intervention, and therefore the room > for error isn't insignificant.) While I certainly understand where you're coming from, I don't really buy into it. Yes, cancelling a query (the only thing normal users can do anyway- they can't terminate backends) could mean the loss of any in-progress work, but it's not like 'rm' and I don't see that it needs to require extra hoops for individuals to go through. Thanks! Stephen
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: