Re: make pg_controldata accept "-D dirname"
От | Abhijit Menon-Sen |
---|---|
Тема | Re: make pg_controldata accept "-D dirname" |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 20140924131606.GA21184@toroid.org обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: make pg_controldata accept "-D dirname" (Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnakangas@vmware.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: make pg_controldata accept "-D dirname"
Re: make pg_controldata accept "-D dirname" |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
At 2014-09-24 16:02:29 +0300, hlinnakangas@vmware.com wrote: > > Thanks. Please update the docs and usage(), too. I'm sorry, but I don't think it would be an improvement to make the docs explain that it's valid to use either "-D datadir" or specify it without an option. If both commands were changed to *require* "-D datadir", that would be worth documenting. But of course I didn't want to change any behaviour for people who have a better memory than I do. I think it's all right as a quick hack to remove an inconsistency that has clearly annoyed many people, but not much more. Would you be OK with my just sticking a "[-D]" before DATADIR in the usage() message for both programs, with no further explanation? (But to be honest, I don't think even that is necessary or desirable.) -- Abhijit
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: