Re: Hide 'Execution time' in EXPLAIN (COSTS OFF)
От | Christoph Berg |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Hide 'Execution time' in EXPLAIN (COSTS OFF) |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 20140923200213.GB1685@msg.df7cb.de обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Hide 'Execution time' in EXPLAIN (COSTS OFF) (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
Ответы |
Re: Hide 'Execution time' in EXPLAIN (COSTS OFF)
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Re: Tom Lane 2014-09-23 <15155.1411493559@sss.pgh.pa.us> > Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> writes: > > On Sat, Sep 20, 2014 at 4:13 PM, Christoph Berg <cb@df7cb.de> wrote: > >> Can we have "EXPLAIN (timing off)" in 9.4+ hide the "Planning time" > >> line? That would even be backwards compatible with 9.x where it would > >> be a no-op. > > > I don't think that'll work becuase: > > > /* check that timing is used with EXPLAIN ANALYZE */ > > if (es.timing && !es.analyze) > > ereport(ERROR, > > (errcode(ERRCODE_INVALID_PARAMETER_VALUE), > > errmsg("EXPLAIN option TIMING > > requires ANALYZE"))); > > It looks to me like that would complain about EXPLAIN (TIMING ON), > not the case Christoph is suggesting. What he proposes seems a bit > odd and non-orthogonal, but we could make the code do it if we wanted. I don't think this warrants a new flag, and TIMING OFF seems to be the right naming for it. (In fact it was the first I tried, and I was cursing quite a bit over the lack of configurability until I realized that COSTS OFF disabled the planning time display as well.) It might be a bit odd, but it's easy to remember. Christoph -- cb@df7cb.de | http://www.df7cb.de/
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: