Re: Memory Alignment in Postgres
От | Bruce Momjian |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Memory Alignment in Postgres |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 20140910202929.GB21173@momjian.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Memory Alignment in Postgres (Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: Memory Alignment in Postgres
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Wed, Sep 10, 2014 at 11:43:52AM -0400, Robert Haas wrote: > But there are a couple of obvious problems with this idea, too, such as: > > 1. It's really complicated and a ton of work. > 2. It would break pg_upgrade pretty darn badly unless we employed some > even-more-complex strategy to mitigate that. > 3. The savings might not be enough to justify the effort. > > It might be interesting for someone to develop a tool measuring the > number of bytes of alignment padding we lose per tuple or per page and > gather some statistics on it on various databases. That would give us > some sense as to the possible savings. And will we ever implement a logical attribute system so we can reorder the stored attribtes to minimize wasted space? -- Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> http://momjian.us EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com + Everyone has their own god. +
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: