Re: PL/pgSQL 2

On Wed, Sep  3, 2014 at 07:54:09AM +0200, Pavel Stehule wrote:
> I am not against to improve a PL/pgSQL. And I repeat, what can be done and can
> be done early:
> 
> a) ASSERT clause -- with some other modification to allow better static analyze
> of DML statements, and enforces checks in runtime.
> 
> b) #option or PRAGMA clause with GUC with function scope that enforce check on
> processed rows after any DML statement
> 
> c) maybe introduction automatic variable ROW_COUNT as shortcut for GET
> DIAGNOSTICS rc = ROW_COUNT

All these ideas are being captured somewhere, right?  Where?

--  Bruce Momjian  <bruce@momjian.us>        http://momjian.us EnterpriseDB
http://enterprisedb.com
 + Everyone has their own god. +