Re: Escaping from blocked send() reprised.
От | Andres Freund |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Escaping from blocked send() reprised. |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 20140902212358.GF28635@awork2.anarazel.de обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Escaping from blocked send() reprised. (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
Ответы |
Re: Escaping from blocked send() reprised.
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On 2014-09-02 17:21:03 -0400, Tom Lane wrote: > Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnakangas@vmware.com> writes: > > I was going to suggest using WaitLatchOrSocket instead of sleeping in 1 > > second increment, but I see that WaitLatchOrSocket() doesn't currently > > support waiting for a socket to become writeable, without also waiting > > for it to become readable. I wonder how difficult it would be to lift > > that restriction. > > My recollection is that there was a reason for that, but I don't recall > details any more. http://git.postgresql.org/pg/commitdiff/e42a21b9e6c9b9e6346a34b62628d48ff2fc6ddf In my prototype I've changed the API that errors set both READABLE/WRITABLE. Seems to work.... Greetings, Andres Freund -- Andres Freund http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: