Re: WAL format and API changes (9.5)
От | Alvaro Herrera |
---|---|
Тема | Re: WAL format and API changes (9.5) |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 20140812145521.GE5728@eldon.alvh.no-ip.org обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: WAL format and API changes (9.5) (Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnakangas@vmware.com>) |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Heikki Linnakangas wrote: > On 08/05/2014 03:50 PM, Michael Paquier wrote: > >- XLogRecGetBlockRefIds needing an already-allocated array for *out is not > >user-friendly. Cannot we just do all the work inside this function? > > I agree it's not a nice API. Returning a palloc'd array would be > nicer, but this needs to work outside the backend too (e.g. > pg_xlogdump). It could return a malloc'd array in frontend code, but > it's not as nice. On the whole, do you think that be better than the > current approach? I don't see the issue. Right now, in frontend code you can call palloc() and pfree(), and they behave like malloc() and free() (see fe_memutils.c). Your module doesn't need to do anything special. -- Álvaro Herrera http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/ PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: