Re: Proposal: Incremental Backup
От | Bruce Momjian |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Proposal: Incremental Backup |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 20140807152528.GC17563@momjian.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Proposal: Incremental Backup (Michael Paquier <michael.paquier@gmail.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: Proposal: Incremental Backup
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Thu, Aug 7, 2014 at 08:35:53PM +0900, Michael Paquier wrote: > On Thu, Aug 7, 2014 at 8:11 PM, Fujii Masao <masao.fujii@gmail.com> wrote: > > There are some data which don't have LSN, for example, postgresql.conf. > > When such data has been modified since last backup, they also need to > > be included in incremental backup? Probably yes. > Definitely yes. That's as well the case of paths like pg_clog, > pg_subtrans and pg_twophase. I assumed these would be unconditionally backed up during an incremental backup because they relatively small and you don't want to make a mistake. -- Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> http://momjian.us EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com + Everyone has their own god. +
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: