Re: 9.4 docs current as of
От | Bruce Momjian |
---|---|
Тема | Re: 9.4 docs current as of |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 20140731030552.GC1040@momjian.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: 9.4 docs current as of (Magnus Hagander <magnus@hagander.net>) |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Thu, Jul 24, 2014 at 06:27:52PM +0200, Magnus Hagander wrote: > On Thu, Jul 24, 2014 at 5:17 PM, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: > > Magnus Hagander <magnus@hagander.net> writes: > >> 9.4 beta docs are listed as "Current as of 2014-05-10". > >> I'm assuming that's just a step we missed in the version stamping? > > > > No, what that means is that nobody has looked at the commit logs since > > then to see if the 9.4 release notes need any updates. Since we don't > > release-note simple bug fixes in a branch before the .0 release, > > 9.4 isn't yet getting the same notes as the back branches; it requires > > a scan of the commit logs with different criteria, ie look for feature > > changes. And I didn't do that over the weekend (I barely got the > > back-branch notes done :-(). > > Ah. I just did a "git log" on it and saw there were a number of > updates in the relnotes themselves, didn't reflect on the fact that > nobody had checked them against *other* updates to the tree. > > > > It will get done at least once before 9.4.0, but I suspect that any > > changes as a result of that will be pretty minor, so I'm not terribly > > upset that it didn't happen for beta2. > > Nope, I agree. I just thought it meant something else... I will update them in the next few weeks so we are ready for final. I normally would have done them before beta2 but was traveling. -- Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> http://momjian.us EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com + Everyone has their own god. +
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: