Re: Proposal to add a QNX 6.5 port to PostgreSQL
От | Andres Freund |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Proposal to add a QNX 6.5 port to PostgreSQL |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 20140728162218.GO17793@alap3.anarazel.de обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Proposal to add a QNX 6.5 port to PostgreSQL (Merlin Moncure <mmoncure@gmail.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: Proposal to add a QNX 6.5 port to PostgreSQL
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On 2014-07-28 11:19:48 -0500, Merlin Moncure wrote: > Maybe step #1 is to get a buildfarm member set up. Is there any > policy against unsupported environments in the buildfarm? (I hope not) > > You're going to have to run it against a git repository containing > your custom patches. It's a long and uncertain road to getting a new > port (re-) accepted, but demonstrated commitment to support is a > necessary first step. It will also advertise support for the platform. I don't think a buildfarm animal that doesn't run the actual upstream code is a good idea. That'll make it a lot harder to understand what's going on when something breaks after a commit. It'd also require the custom patches being rebased ontop of $branch before every run... Greetings, Andres Freund -- Andres Freund http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: