Re: pg_upgrade < 9.3 -> >=9.3 misses a step around multixacts
От | Andres Freund |
---|---|
Тема | Re: pg_upgrade < 9.3 -> >=9.3 misses a step around multixacts |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 20140721163409.GB14989@alap3.anarazel.de обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: pg_upgrade < 9.3 -> >=9.3 misses a step around multixacts (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
Ответы |
Re: pg_upgrade < 9.3 -> >=9.3 misses a step around multixacts
|
Список | pgsql-bugs |
On 2014-07-21 12:20:56 -0400, Tom Lane wrote: > Andres Freund <andres@2ndquadrant.com> writes: > > 2) From a pedantic POV lastSane* should be initialized to > > ReadNewTransactionId()/ReadNextMultiXactId(). On a busy system we could > > otherwise consider concurrently updated values as being too new if some > > longrunning transaction finishes. Also GetOldestXmin() can sometimes go > > backwards... > > If it's wrong then that's a pre-existing bug, but I don't think it's > wrong. I'm not wondering so much about vac_update_relstats(). There indeed the calls aren't new and the worst that can happen is a slightly older freeze limit. I'm more wondering about vac_update_datfrozenxid(). Afaics we very well could hit newFrozenXid = lastSaneFrozenXid = GetOldestXmin(NULL, true); newMinMulti = lastSaneMinMulti = GetOldestMultiXactId(); ... /* * If things are working properly, no relation should have a * relfrozenxid or relminmxid that is "in the future". However, such * cases have been known to arise due to bugs in pg_upgrade. If we * see any entries that are "in the future", chicken out and don't do * anything. This ensures we won't truncate clog before those * relations have been scanned and cleaned up. */ if (TransactionIdPrecedes(lastSaneFrozenXid, classForm->relfrozenxid) || MultiXactIdPrecedes(lastSaneMinMulti, classForm->relminmxid)) { bogus = true; break; } for a relation that has just been vacuumed by another backend. In a database with a high number of pg_class entries/much bloat it's not that unrealistic that relfrozenxid/relminmxid have been updated since the GetOldest* calls above. Since vac_update_relstats() writes them using heap_inplace_update() the window for that isn't particularly small. That could potentially lead to never updating the database freeze limits, right? Greetings, Andres Freund -- Andres Freund http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/ PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services
В списке pgsql-bugs по дате отправления: