Re: Pg_upgrade and toast tables bug discovered
От | Andres Freund |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Pg_upgrade and toast tables bug discovered |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 20140716142431.GA1471@alap3.anarazel.de обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Pg_upgrade and toast tables bug discovered (Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us>) |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On 2014-07-16 10:19:05 -0400, Bruce Momjian wrote: > > > What would be nice is if I could mark just the tables that will need > > > toast tables created in that later phase (those tables that didn't have > > > a toast table in the old cluster, but need one in the new cluster). > > > However, I can't see where to store that or how to pass that back into > > > pg_upgrade. I don't see a logical place in pg_class to put it. > > > > This seems overengineered. Why not just do > > SELECT pg_upgrade.maintain_toast(oid) FROM pg_class WHERE relkind = 'r'; > > > > and in maintain_toast() just call AlterTableCreateToastTable()? > > I didn't think you could call into backend functions like that, and if I > did, it might break something in the future. Why not? Pg_upgrade is already intimately linked into to the way the backend works. Greetings, Andres Freund -- Andres Freund http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: