Re: BUG #10911: pg_upgrade appears to lose the transaction id epoch
От | Bruce Momjian |
---|---|
Тема | Re: BUG #10911: pg_upgrade appears to lose the transaction id epoch |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 20140708224828.GA1697@momjian.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | BUG #10911: pg_upgrade appears to lose the transaction id epoch (gregburek@heroku.com) |
Ответы |
Re: BUG #10911: pg_upgrade appears to lose the transaction id epoch
|
Список | pgsql-bugs |
On Tue, Jul 8, 2014 at 09:17:05PM +0000, gregburek@heroku.com wrote: > The following bug has been logged on the website: > > Bug reference: 10911 > Logged by: Greg Burek > Email address: gregburek@heroku.com > PostgreSQL version: 9.0.17 > Operating system: Ubuntu Linux > Description: > > When upgrading a 9.0.17 db to 9.3.4 via pg_upgrade, the transaction ids > appear to fall backward in time: > > >From before the upgrade: > => SELECT txid_snapshot_xmax(txid_current_snapshot()); > txid_snapshot_xmax > -------------------- > 66329538555 > (1 row) > > After the upgrade: > > => SELECT txid_snapshot_xmax(txid_current_snapshot()); > txid_snapshot_xmax > -------------------- > 1905029395 > (1 row) > > Looking at pg_control before the upgrade: > $ pg_controldata /database/ | grep -i nextxid > Latest checkpoint's NextXID: 15/1905728256 > > After the upgrade: > $ pg_controldata /database/ | grep -i nextxid > Latest checkpoint's NextXID: 0/1905029398 > > > This is an unexpected loss of the higher order bits when the upgrade is > performed. Is it possible to preserve the epoch across the upgrade? Yes, this was reported in April 2014: http://www.postgresql.org/message-id/CAJ2ymdgTEQ8AETJnQUeEuGjk-OGPWQn_MXgEY5urJpXbJNcohg@mail.gmail.com I will try to fix it for 9.5, due in 2015. -- Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> http://momjian.us EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com + Everyone has their own god. +
В списке pgsql-bugs по дате отправления: