Re: 9.4 documentation: duplicate paragraph in logical decoding example
От | Andres Freund |
---|---|
Тема | Re: 9.4 documentation: duplicate paragraph in logical decoding example |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 20140707052344.GE17261@awork2.anarazel.de обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: 9.4 documentation: duplicate paragraph in logical decoding example (Fujii Masao <masao.fujii@gmail.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: 9.4 documentation: duplicate paragraph in logical
decoding example
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On 2014-07-07 12:50:17 +0900, Fujii Masao wrote: > On Sun, Jul 6, 2014 at 2:41 AM, Christoph Moench-Tegeder > <cmt@burggraben.net> wrote: > > Hi, > > > > while reading the logical decoding docs, I came across a duplicated > > paragraph in doc/src/sgml/logicaldecoding.sgml - in the current > > master branch, lines 108 to 115 are the same as lines 117 to 124. > > I've attached a patch which removes the second instance of that > > paragraph. > > In case it is intended to demonstrate that the changes in the stream > > were not consumed by pg_logical_slot_peek_changes(), > > I didn't write that text, but I think that's the reason why the same > texts exist. It was me... I was being cute^Wtired^Wuhhh and thought the duplicated content would demonstrate that nothing has happened due to the decoding stream. But since you're now the second person confused by it I guess we better rephrase it. > > reworded like "the changes have > > not been consumed by the previous command", just to avoid making > > it look like that paragraph had been duplicated by accident :) > > I'm OK with this. Care to submit a patch for it Christoph? Greetings, Andres Freund -- Andres Freund http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: