Re: pg_upgrade < 9.3 -> >=9.3 misses a step around multixacts
От | Bruce Momjian |
---|---|
Тема | Re: pg_upgrade < 9.3 -> >=9.3 misses a step around multixacts |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 20140619020633.GA20469@momjian.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: pg_upgrade < 9.3 -> >=9.3 misses a step around multixacts (Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us>) |
Ответы |
Re: pg_upgrade < 9.3 -> >=9.3 misses a step around multixacts
|
Список | pgsql-bugs |
On Wed, Jun 18, 2014 at 09:52:05PM -0400, Bruce Momjian wrote: > On Wed, Jun 18, 2014 at 06:51:31PM -0400, Alvaro Herrera wrote: > > > This is a bug in 9.3 pg_upgrade as well? Why has no one reported it > > > before? > > > > I think one reason is that not all upgrades see an issue here; for old > > clusters that haven't gone beyond the 0000 offset file, there is no > > problem. For clusters that have gone beyond 0000 but not by much, the > > file will be deleted during the first truncation. It only becomes a > > problem if the cluster is close enough to 2^31. Another thing to keep > > in consideration is that initdb initializes all databases' datminmxid to > > 1. If the old cluster was past the 2^31 point, it means the datminmxid > > doesn't move from 1 until the actual wraparound. > > OK, so the xid has to be beyond 2^31 during pg_upgrade to trigger a > problem? That might explain the rare reporting of this bug. What would > the test query look like so we can tell people when to remove the '0000' > files? Would we need to see the existence of '0000' and high-numbered > files? How high? What does a 2^31 file look like? Also, what would a legitimate 0000 file at wrap-around time look like? Would there have to be an 'ffff' or 'ffffff' file? -- Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> http://momjian.us EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com + Everyone has their own god. +
В списке pgsql-bugs по дате отправления: