Re: How about a proper TEMPORARY TABLESPACE?
От | Alvaro Herrera |
---|---|
Тема | Re: How about a proper TEMPORARY TABLESPACE? |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 20140618195333.GM18688@eldon.alvh.no-ip.org обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: How about a proper TEMPORARY TABLESPACE? (Stephen Frost <sfrost@snowman.net>) |
Ответы |
Re: How about a proper TEMPORARY TABLESPACE?
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Stephen Frost wrote: > * Tom Lane (tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us) wrote: > > Stephen Frost <sfrost@snowman.net> writes: > > > Yes. I'd definitely like to see an ALTER TABLESPACE option, with an > > > ERROR that lists out all of the non-temporary objects which are found > > > (and lists any other databases which have objects in those > > > tablespaces..). That would allow administrators who have existing > > > notionally temporary-only tablespaces to go clean things up to make them > > > actually temporary-only. > > I would certainly suggest that the first version of the patch not > > undertake to allow this property to be ALTERed; the cost-benefit > > ratio isn't there IMO. > > I suppose scheduling downtime to do the check manually across all > databases, then drop and recreate the tablespace, would work. As > someone who's working with a couple of these cases, it'd be awful nice > if there was a way PG would handle it for me. I wonder if some form of NOT VALID marking could be useful here. Of course, this is not a constraint. But a mechanism of a similar spirit seems apropos. It seems reasonable to leave such a thing for future improvement. -- Álvaro Herrera http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/ PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: