Re: BUG #10533: 9.4 beta1 assertion failure in autovacuum process
| От | Andres Freund |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: BUG #10533: 9.4 beta1 assertion failure in autovacuum process |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 20140606205801.GB23201@awork2.anarazel.de обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | Re: BUG #10533: 9.4 beta1 assertion failure in autovacuum process (Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@2ndquadrant.com>) |
| Ответы |
Re: BUG #10533: 9.4 beta1 assertion failure in autovacuum process
Re: BUG #10533: 9.4 beta1 assertion failure in autovacuum process |
| Список | pgsql-bugs |
On 2014-06-06 16:55:58 -0400, Alvaro Herrera wrote: > Keith Fiske wrote: > > Not sure if this is the same issue originally reported, but the description > > sounded the same. I can get this to happen pretty reliably in 9.4beta1 with > > the pgtap test suite for one of my extensions - > > Uh, this is a completely different problem. We discussed long ago that > those pallocs in relpath() were going to cause a problem: I actually don't think it's a different problem. If we'd restructure things so the critical sections are separate this wouldn't be a problem. It's imo not a particularly good idea to mdopen() inside a critical section either. Greetings, Andres Freund -- Andres Freund http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/ PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services
В списке pgsql-bugs по дате отправления: