Re: uninterruptable loop: concurrent delete in progress within table
От | Andres Freund |
---|---|
Тема | Re: uninterruptable loop: concurrent delete in progress within table |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 20140604231049.GM785@awork2.anarazel.de обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: uninterruptable loop: concurrent delete in progress within table (Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: uninterruptable loop: concurrent delete in progress within table
|
Список | pgsql-bugs |
On 2014-06-04 19:03:15 -0400, Robert Haas wrote: > On Mon, Jun 2, 2014 at 1:35 PM, Andres Freund <andres@2ndquadrant.com> wrote: > > Robert: Do you remember that case? > > > > Alvaro: In the end it'd not be very harmful - if it happens > > TransactionIdDidCommit() will return false (there's special case code > > for it). > > Not specifically, but I'd be surprised if it isn't possible. Wouldn't that mean that every single visibility routine in tqual.c is buggy? I am not convinced there aren't further bugs in some corner cases in tqual.c. But even a low likelihood scenarious of xmax = InvalidTransactionId && (infomask & XMAX_INVALID) == 0 would have become visible by now given how widespread/central those tests are? Greetings, Andres Freund -- Andres Freund http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/ PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services
В списке pgsql-bugs по дате отправления: