Re: pg_upgrade fails: Mismatch of relation OID in database 8.4 -> 9.3
От | Bruce Momjian |
---|---|
Тема | Re: pg_upgrade fails: Mismatch of relation OID in database 8.4 -> 9.3 |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 20140521183126.GA25449@momjian.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: pg_upgrade fails: Mismatch of relation OID in database 8.4 -> 9.3 (Jeff Ross <jeff@commandprompt.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: pg_upgrade fails: Mismatch of relation OID in database 8.4 -> 9.3
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Wed, May 21, 2014 at 10:56:59AM -0600, Jeff Ross wrote: > > On 5/21/14, 9:13 AM, Bruce Momjian wrote: > > > >On Wed, May 21, 2014 at 09:11:05AM -0600, Jeff Ross wrote: > >>-- For binary upgrade, set heap's relfrozenxid > >>UPDATE pg_catalog.pg_class > >>SET relfrozenxid = '1944' > >>WHERE oid = 'contact_email'::pg_catalog.regclass; > >> > >>-- For binary upgrade, set toast's relfrozenxid > >>UPDATE pg_catalog.pg_class > >>SET relfrozenxid = '2715452' > >>WHERE oid = '22588'; > >> > >> > >>I should run the update commands only, correct? > > > >Uh, not really. We need to replicate what pg_upgrade is doing, and I > >can't be sure I am replicating your environment if I try it here. > > > >You need to use 9.3 pg_dump to dump the schema on 8.4, then use that > >dump to recreate the table on 8.4 _and_ 9.3 and then check for toast > >existance. You are not going to do a pg_dump on 9.3. > > > > > Thanks for the clarification. > > Yes, using 9.3's pg_dump of 8.4 and applying it to both an 8.4 and a > 9.3 cluster, the contact_email table now has toast in both 8.4 and > 9.3. So the big question is why doesn't the existing 8.4 table have a toast table? Did you use pg_upgrade on the old cluster before, e.g. from 8.3? -- Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> http://momjian.us EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com + Everyone has their own god. +
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: