Re: New pg_lsn type doesn't have hash/btree opclasses
От | Andres Freund |
---|---|
Тема | Re: New pg_lsn type doesn't have hash/btree opclasses |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 20140506134459.GA5658@awork2.anarazel.de обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: New pg_lsn type doesn't have hash/btree opclasses (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
Ответы |
Re: New pg_lsn type doesn't have hash/btree opclasses
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On 2014-05-06 09:37:54 -0400, Tom Lane wrote: > Andres Freund <andres@2ndquadrant.com> writes: > > Craig just mentioned in an internal chat that there's no btree or even > > hash opclass for the new pg_lsn type. That restricts what you can do > > with it quite severely. > > Imo this should be fixed for 9.4 - after all it was possible unto now to > > index a table with lsns returned by system functions or have queries > > with grouping on them without casting. > > Sorry, it is *way* too late for 9.4. It's imo a regression/oversight introduced in the pg_lsn patch. Not a new feature. Greetings, Andres Freund -- Andres Freund http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: