Re: Cluster name in ps output
От | Andres Freund |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Cluster name in ps output |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 20140505153753.GB27783@awork2.anarazel.de обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Cluster name in ps output (Stephen Frost <sfrost@snowman.net>) |
Ответы |
Re: Cluster name in ps output
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On 2014-05-05 08:03:04 -0400, Stephen Frost wrote: > Craig, > > * Craig Ringer (craig@2ndquadrant.com) wrote: > > postgres[5433]: checkpointer process > > > > at least as useful. The only time that's not unique is in a BSD jail or > > lxc container, and in those cases IIRC ps can show you the > > jail/container anyway. > > Uhh, that's not at all true. You can trivially have multiple IPs on a > box w/o jails or containers (aliased interfaces) and then run PG on the > default port- which I find to be *far* more convenient than having the > same IP and a bunch of different ports. Only that you then need different socket directories. Do you really do that regularly? Anyway, I am happy having the cluster_name thingy. Greetings, Andres Freund -- Andres Freund http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: