Re: Cluster name in ps output
От | Tom Lane |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Cluster name in ps output |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 20134.1404484423@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Cluster name in ps output (Vik Fearing <vik.fearing@dalibo.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: Cluster name in ps output
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Vik Fearing <vik.fearing@dalibo.com> writes: >> You mean that if synchronous_standby_names is an empty it automatically >> should be set to cluster_name? > No, I mean that synchronous_standby_names should look at cluster_name > first, and if it's not set then unfortunately look at application_name > for backward compatibility. I think you're failing to explain yourself very well. What you really mean is that we should use cluster_name not application_name to determine the name that a standby server reports to the master. There's something to that, perhaps, but I think that the mechanism we use for doing the reporting involves the application_name parameter passed through libpq. It might be a bit painful to change that, and I'm not entirely sure it'd be less confusing. regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: