Re: Re: default opclass for jsonb (was Re: Call for GIST/GIN/SP-GIST opclass documentation)

On Wed, Apr 23, 2014 at 10:20:42AM +0200, Petr Jelinek wrote:
> On 23/04/14 00:40, Peter Geoghegan wrote:
> >On Tue, Apr 22, 2014 at 3:32 PM, Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> wrote:
> >>Where are we on the default JSONB opclass change?
> >
> >FWIW, I still don't have any strong opinion here. I defer to others on
> >this question.
> >
> 
> I vote for changing it, even though neither option is ideal I think
> that given the nature of datatype the current default will break
> inserts for common usage pattern and that's much worse than not
> being able to use the index for some operators.

I agree.  We should choose the most general option as the default.

--  Bruce Momjian  <bruce@momjian.us>        http://momjian.us EnterpriseDB
http://enterprisedb.com
 + Everyone has their own god. +