Re: Patch for CREATE RULE sgml -- Was in: [DOCS]
От | Bruce Momjian |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Patch for CREATE RULE sgml -- Was in: [DOCS] |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 20140422215454.GG10046@momjian.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Patch for CREATE RULE sgml -- Was in: [DOCS] (Fujii Masao <masao.fujii@gmail.com>) |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Mon, Mar 24, 2014 at 09:51:07PM +0900, Fujii Masao wrote: > On Sat, Mar 22, 2014 at 12:56 AM, Emanuel Calvo > <emanuel.calvo@2ndquadrant.com> wrote: > > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > > Hash: SHA512 > > > > > > > > Hi guys, > > > > I realized that the output of the CREATE RULE has not a detailed > > output for the "events" parameter. > > > > But the question here is that I'm not sure which format follow: > > > > { INSERT | UPDATE | DELETE | SELECT} > > > > or > > > > INSERT > > UPDATE > > DELETE > > SELECT > > - -- > > > > > > I attach a patch for each one. > > Though I'm not sure the right policy of the format in synopsis, ISTM that > the following format is suitable in this case, i.e., if the value list > is very simple. > Patch attached. > > SELECT | INSERT | UPDATE | DELETE Patch applied. -- Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> http://momjian.us EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com + Everyone has their own god. +
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: