Re: streaming replication - pgsql 9.2.3
От | Jim Mercer |
---|---|
Тема | Re: streaming replication - pgsql 9.2.3 |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 20140414215143.GA38476@reptiles.org обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: streaming replication - pgsql 9.2.3 (Jason Mathis <jmathis@redzonesoftware.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: streaming replication - pgsql 9.2.3
|
Список | pgsql-admin |
On Mon, Apr 14, 2014 at 03:14:46PM -0600, Jason Mathis wrote: > Just keep in mind that while wal archiving and replication sound very similar they are intended for two different things.?? > > Wal Archiving = backup/DR/PITR/standby > Replication = High availability/reporting?? it would be nice if the documentation reflected this. the current information i derived, basically says to do both. i'm looking to revise my settings to: - nullify/NOP the archive_command and restore_command - use the slave to do a pg_dumpall as the backup the standby node serves as a read-only slave, which allows for some performance gains. the standby node could be promoted to master, should the master have issues. the backup would allow for a recovery from a catestrophic/cascading error (ie. drop all tables). does this make sense? -- Jim Mercer Reptilian Research jim@reptiles.org +1 416 410-5633 "He who dies with the most toys is nonetheless dead"
В списке pgsql-admin по дате отправления: