Re: BUG #8695: Reloading dump fails at COMMENT ON EXTENSION plpgsql
От | Bruce Momjian |
---|---|
Тема | Re: BUG #8695: Reloading dump fails at COMMENT ON EXTENSION plpgsql |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 20140410024345.GA31142@momjian.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: BUG #8695: Reloading dump fails at COMMENT ON EXTENSION plpgsql (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
Ответы |
Re: BUG #8695: Reloading dump fails at COMMENT ON EXTENSION plpgsql
|
Список | pgsql-bugs |
On Wed, Apr 9, 2014 at 10:15:28PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote: > Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> writes: > > I see a filter on pg_catalog for pg_proc. Is there a reason there isn't > > one for pg_extension? > > Extensions don't live in schemas. That's what I thought too, but I see a schema file in pg_extensions: test=> \d pg_extension Table "pg_catalog.pg_extension" Column | Type | Modifiers ----------------+---------+----------- extname | name | not null extowner | oid | not null --> extnamespace | oid | not null extrelocatable | boolean | not null extversion | text | extconfig | oid[] | extcondition | text[] | Indexes: "pg_extension_name_index" UNIQUE, btree (extname) "pg_extension_oid_index" UNIQUE, btree (oid) SELECT extname, extnamespace, nspname FROM pg_extension, pg_namespace WHERE extnamespace = pg_namespace.oid; extname | extnamespace | nspname ---------+--------------+------------ plpgsql | 11 | pg_catalog (1 row) Should we hard-code a pg_catalog plpgsql to be skipped in pg_dump? -- Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> http://momjian.us EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com + Everyone has their own god. +
В списке pgsql-bugs по дате отправления: