Re: jsonb status
От | Andres Freund |
---|---|
Тема | Re: jsonb status |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 20140319162828.GC5459@awork2.anarazel.de обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | jsonb status (Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net>) |
Ответы |
Re: jsonb status
Re: jsonb status |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Hi, On 2014-03-13 17:00:33 -0400, Andrew Dunstan wrote: > Peter Geoghegan has been doing a lot of great cleanup of the jsonb code, > after moving in the bits we wanted from nested hstore. You can see the > current state of the code at > <https://github.com/feodor/postgres/tree/jsonb_and_hstore> I've pushed one commit with minor fixes, and one with several FIXMEs to http://git.postgresql.org/gitweb/?p=users/andresfreund/postgres.git;a=shortlog;h=refs/heads/jsonb_and_hstore The most imortant things are: * Jsonb vs JsonbValue is just bad, the latter needs to be renamed, and there needs to be a very clear explanation about whytwo forms exist and what each is used for. * The whole datastructure doesn't have any sensible highlevel documentation. * I don't really like the JsonbSuperHeader name/abstraction. What does the "Super" mean? The only interpetation I see isthat it's the toplevel header (why not Top then?), but JEntry has the comment: "/* May be accessed as superheader */"... Greetings, Andres Freund -- Andres Freund http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: