Re: Changeset Extraction v7.9.1
От | Andres Freund |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Changeset Extraction v7.9.1 |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 20140307133201.GB22909@awork2.anarazel.de обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Changeset Extraction v7.9.1 (Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@2ndquadrant.com>) |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On 2014-03-07 10:17:21 -0300, Alvaro Herrera wrote: > Andres Freund escribió: > > > fprintf(stderr, > > - _("%s: could not identify system: got %d rows and %d fields, expected %d rows and %d fields\n"), > > - progname, PQntuples(res), PQnfields(res), 1, 3); > > + _("%s: could not identify system: got %d rows and %d fields, expected 1 row and 3 or more fields\n"), > > + progname, PQntuples(res), PQnfields(res)); > > Please don't change this. The reason these messages use %d and an extra > printf argument is to avoid giving translators extra work when the > number of rows or fields is changed. In these cases I suggest this: > > > - _("%s: could not identify system: got %d rows and %d fields, expected %d rows and %d fields\n"), > > - progname, PQntuples(res), PQnfields(res), 1, 3); > > + _("%s: could not identify system: got %d rows and %d fields, expected %d rows and %d or more fields\n"), > > + progname, PQntuples(res), PQnfields(res), 1, 3); > > (Yes, I know the "expected 1 rows" output looks a bit silly. Since this > is an unexpected error message anyway, I don't think that's worth > fixing.) I changed it to not use placeholders because I thought "or more" was specific enough to be unlikely to be used in other places, but I don't have a problem with continuing to use them. Greetings, Andres Freund -- Andres Freund http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: