Re: Patch: show relation and tuple infos of a lock to acquire
От | Christian Kruse |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Patch: show relation and tuple infos of a lock to acquire |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 20140227104427.GD24373@defunct.ch обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Patch: show relation and tuple infos of a lock to acquire (Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: Patch: show relation and tuple infos of a lock to acquire
Re: Patch: show relation and tuple infos of a lock to acquire Re: Patch: show relation and tuple infos of a lock to acquire |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Hi, On 25/02/14 16:11, Robert Haas wrote: > On Mon, Feb 24, 2014 at 10:13 AM, Christian Kruse > <christian@2ndquadrant.com> wrote: > > To be honest, I don't like the idea of setting up this error context > > only for log_lock_wait messages. This sounds unnecessary complex to me > > and I think that in the few cases where this message doesn't add a > > value (and thus is useless) don't justify such complexity. > > Reading this over, I'm not sure I understand why this is a CONTEXT at > all and not just a DETAIL for the particular error message that it's > supposed to be decorating. Generally CONTEXT should be used for > information that will be relevant to all errors in a given code path, > and DETAIL for extra information specific to a particular error. Because there is more than one scenario where this context is useful, not just log_lock_wait messages. > If we're going to stick with CONTEXT, we could rephrase it like this: > > CONTEXT: while attempting to lock tuple (1,2) in relation with OID 3456 > > or when the relation name is known: > > CONTEXT: while attempting to lock tuple (1,2) in relation "public"."foo" Accepted. Patch attached. > >> Displaying whole tuple doesn't seem to be the most right way > >> to get debug information and especially in this case we are > >> already displaying tuple offset(ctid) which is unique identity > >> to identify a tuple. It seems to me that it is sufficient to display > >> unique value of tuple if present. > >> I understand that there is no clear issue here, so may be if others also > >> share their opinion then it will be quite easy to take a call. > > I wouldn't be inclined to dump the whole tuple under any > circumstances. That could be a lot more data than what you want > dumped in your log. The PK could already be somewhat unreasonably > large, but the whole tuple could be a lot more unreasonably large. Well, as I already stated: we don't. I copied the behavior we use in CHECK constraints (ExecBuildSlotValueDescription()). Best regards, -- Christian Kruse http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/ PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services
Вложения
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: