Re: should we add a XLogRecPtr/LSN SQL type?
От | Andres Freund |
---|---|
Тема | Re: should we add a XLogRecPtr/LSN SQL type? |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 20140219235533.GB3391@alap3.anarazel.de обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: should we add a XLogRecPtr/LSN SQL type? (Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: should we add a XLogRecPtr/LSN SQL type?
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On 2014-02-19 12:47:40 -0500, Robert Haas wrote: > On Wed, Feb 5, 2014 at 9:26 PM, Michael Paquier > <michael.paquier@gmail.com> wrote: > >> Yes, that's a good precedent in multiple ways. > > Here are updated patches to use pg_lsn instead of pglsn... > > OK, so I think this stuff is all committed now, with assorted changes. > Thanks for your work on this. cool, thanks you two. I wonder if pg_stat_replication shouldn't be updated to use it as well? SELECT * FROM pg_attribute WHERE attname ~ '(location|lsn)'; only shows that as names that are possible candidates for conversion. Greetings, Andres Freund -- Andres Freund http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: