Re: [PERFORM] encouraging index-only scans
От | Bruce Momjian |
---|---|
Тема | Re: [PERFORM] encouraging index-only scans |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 20140211182319.GF2289@momjian.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: [PERFORM] encouraging index-only scans (Andres Freund <andres@2ndquadrant.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: [PERFORM] encouraging index-only scans
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Tue, Feb 11, 2014 at 06:54:10PM +0100, Andres Freund wrote: > On 2014-02-11 12:12:13 -0500, Bruce Momjian wrote: > > Yes, that pretty much sums it up. We introduced index-only scans in 9.2 > > (2012) but they still seem to be not usable for insert-only workloads > > two years later. Based on current progress, it doesn't look like this > > will be corrected until 9.5 (2015). I am kind of confused why this has > > not generated more urgency. > > I think this largely FUD. They are hugely beneficial in some scenarios > and less so in others. Just like lots of other features we have. I don't understand. Index-only scans are known to have benefits --- if an insert-only workload can't use that, why is that acceptable? What is fear-uncertainty-and-doubt about that? Please explain. -- Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> http://momjian.us EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com + Everyone has their own god. +
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: