Re: Changeset Extraction v7.5
От | Andres Freund |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Changeset Extraction v7.5 |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 20140207234311.GF2792@awork2.anarazel.de обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Changeset Extraction v7.5 (Thom Brown <thom@linux.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: Changeset Extraction v7.5
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On 2014-02-07 20:58:14 +0000, Thom Brown wrote: > On 7 February 2014 19:35, Andres Freund <andres@2ndquadrant.com> wrote: > > 0004: wal_decoding: Documentation for replication slots and changeset extraction > > The usage of pg_create_decoding_replication_slot does show the "(1 row)" line. > > The output of "SELECT * FROM pg_replication_slots;" is out-of-date. Thanks, refreshed. > There appears to be a column named "slot_name" and "slottype". Could > one of these have or not have the underscore for consistency? That's luckily already fixed... > The example also shows output from pg_decoding_slot_get_changes after > inserting 2 rows, but when I run the same example, there are no rows > returned: > And running the transaction with inserts again, there's no output from > that same function command. I always get an output from isolated > INSERT statements. I should point out that in my .psqlrc file I have > "\set ON_ERROR_ROLLBACK". If I use psql -X, this symptom no longer > occurs, so I think the automatic savepoints are interfering, and the > effect appears to be inconsistent. Thanks, that's a bug indeed. I have experimentally fixed the bug, not sure whether I like the fix yet, or not. I've already fixed two issues caused by the rebase onto 858ec11858a914d4c380971985709b6d6b7dd6fc. Is pushing to git sufficient for you, or shall I rebase and resend the series? Thanks! Andres Freund -- Andres Freund http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: