Re: Recovery inconsistencies, standby much larger than primary
От | Andres Freund |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Recovery inconsistencies, standby much larger than primary |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 20140206224842.GM12016@awork2.anarazel.de обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Recovery inconsistencies, standby much larger than primary (Greg Stark <stark@mit.edu>) |
Ответы |
Re: Recovery inconsistencies, standby much larger than primary
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On 2014-02-06 23:41:19 +0100, Greg Stark wrote: > The problem with the bgwriter being at fault is that from what I can > see the bgwriter will never extend a file. That means the xlog > recovery code must have done it. That means even if the bgwriter came > along and looked at the buffer we just read in it would already be too > late to cause mischief. The xlog code extends the file *first* then > reads in the backup block into a buffer. I can't see how it could > corrupt the stack or the wal recovery buffer in the window between > reading in the wal buffer and deciding to extend the relation. That's not necessarily true. If e.g. the buffer mapping would change racily, the result write from the bgwriter could very well end up increasing the file size, leaving a hole inbetween its write and the original size. Are there any other relations that are as big as the corrupted relations got extended to? Greetings, Andres Freund -- Andres Freund http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: