Re: Misaligned BufferDescriptors causing major performance problems on AMD
От | Andres Freund |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Misaligned BufferDescriptors causing major performance problems on AMD |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 20140206084032.GI28649@alap3.anarazel.de обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Misaligned BufferDescriptors causing major performance problems on AMD (Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: Misaligned BufferDescriptors causing major
performance problems on AMD
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On 2014-02-05 12:36:42 -0500, Robert Haas wrote: > >> It may well be that your proposal is spot on. But I'd like to see some > >> data-structure-by-data-structure measurements, rather than assuming that > >> alignment must be a good thing. > > > > I am fine with just aligning BufferDescriptors properly. That has > > clearly shown massive improvements. > > I thought your previous idea of increasing BUFFERALIGN to 64 bytes had > a lot to recommend it. Good. I wonder if we shouldn't move that bit of logic:if (size >= BUFSIZ) newStart = BUFFERALIGN(newStart); out of ShmemAlloc() and instead have a ShmemAllocAligned() and ShmemInitStructAligned() that does it. So we can sensibly can control it per struct. > But that doesn't mean it doesn't need testing. I feel the need here, to say that I never said it doesn't need testing and never thought it didn't... Greetings, Andres Freund -- Andres Freund http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: